Fake Prophets

 

ψευδοπροφήτης pseudoprophḗtēs, from G5571 and G4396; a spurious prophet, i.e. pretended foreteller or religious impostor:—false prophet.[1]

 

“Modern Man the Manipulator”

FAKE science narratives are what Scripture calls “science falsely so called” (1 Timothy 6:20). Many science myths have now become part and parcel of our modern society. Concurrently there is much scientific fact that is being squelched. Thus many believers are having difficulty sorting out TRUTH from ERROR. This “sorting out” process is known as DISCERNMENT.  

 

In 1970 Dr. Francis Schaeffer warned the church about the rise of Progressivism, Humanism and Postmodernism. Specifically he wrote about “modern man the manipulator” in chapter 7 of his book The Church at the End of the 20th Century (Inter-Varsity, 1970). With great foresight he predicted:

Schaeffer classified the original fake science as evolution, i.e., Darwinism. Darwinism was really the first big experiment — not a true science experiment, but rather a grandiose psycho-social-spiritual experiment in altering man’s perception of God’s true reality. As a result much science has been flawed for the past several centuries. Darwinian science gave birth to a faulty geology (pun intended) about earth’s true age, Noah’s actual flood and current (and endtime) seismic events.[2] Evolutionary biology gave rise to tinkering with DNA.

 

The false evolution paradigm obliterated the story about the fall of man in the Garden of Eden, “For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God” (Romans 3:23). To offer man a pathway to self-fulfillment other than the Gospel of salvation, evolution forged other disciplines such as anthropology, sociology, and psychology. In this way evolution has permeated the entire mindset of Western civilization, supplanting biblical Truth about the nature of man and the creation of the universe. (Read our landmark article “Esoteric Evolution”.) To a staggering extent the compromised postmodern Church world has bought into the Darwinian mindset, eviscerating the Gospel of salvation.[3]

 

Schaeffer described how this evolutionary worldview could become a tool for manipulation of people:

 

 

He presciently warned about a day when the science establishment elites would be tempted to seize power:

 

Observing the terrifying potentials of the new science that was emerging fifty years ago, he warned specifically about both “chemical and electrical manipulation.” He cited Arthur Koestler’s book The Ghost in the Machine which advocated drugging man to assist in our evolution. He reported on a December 1, 1969 Newsweek article predicting “drugs to blunt curiosity and initiative.” (p. 97) He also noticed  high profile scientists plotting ways to reduce the world’s population.

The first global science experiment to reduce the world’s population was abortion. The public was fed the LIE by the Establishment Media and certain segments of the medical scientific community that an unborn baby is a merely a piece of tissue. Many believed this fake science narrative.

 

A year later I organized a local television showing of Dr. Bernard Nathanson’s film The Silent Scream which filmed an actual abortion via ultrasound. Dr. Nathanson was an atheist at the time. He told us he had personally been responsible for over 72,000 abortions. This new technology persuaded him that the very babies he had once killed could be saved. He believed in the potential of man’s reason, and he decided to employ ultrasound technology to show the accurate fact that a baby was being dismembered by suction. Once enlightened by this incontrovertible evidence, Dr. Nathanson assumed that rational scientists, medical personnel, politicians, the courts and the public would be appalled at the obvious destruction of a human life and seek to save it.

What happened when emerging neonatal technology revealed indisputable facts about the baby in the womb? Was there a return to rational thinking and reason? Did this change the scientific narrative? Was there widespread repentance amongst evangelicals, who were already complicit in abortions? No! By this time Christians were engaging in the same sexual sins that lead up to abortions. The media continued to parrot the fake science that the tender developing baby was “just a piece of tissue.” Many willfully chose to believe this obvious fraud. But, as Schaeffer noted, “modern man is a mystic” and “irrational” (p. 18). The silent Church was already compromised!

Make no mistake about it, abortion is based on a pseudo-science of DEATH and not LIFE. It has only gotten worse. In 1970 Schaeffer was already forewarning about the manipulation of human genetics along with technological enhancements, and his worst fears are now confirmed daily in the news. For example, he raised the following questions:

Exhibit C: A Dehomag (IBM) poster, Germany, 1934. Early computer databanking surveillance identified Jews for extermination. See: Edwin Black, IBM & the Holocaust

In the context of describing the manipulation of science, Schaeffer noticed potent new methods and tactics of lying and deceiving employed by mass media. He witnessed the rise of television and noticed how visual images could be edited to create alternate realities. He identified some of the early subliminal psychological tactics of sensory and mental/emotional manipulation being employed by marketers. 

 

He also pinpointed the lurking dangers of computer technology. He understood computers well enough to grasp the ultimate deadly ramifications if this technology would one day be wielded by a power elite:

The existence of the computer and the control it puts into the hands of those in power steps up the power of each of the forms of modern manipulation in the hands of the manipulators.(p. 99)

Could Schaeffer have foreseen the advent of social media, in which corporate tech marketers would profit from collecting and selling intimate human psycho-social data for the purpose of altering mankind’s beliefs, values, ethics, morals, opinions and behaviors? Could he have predicted the rise of deepfakes, where truth is nearly impossible to distinguish from lie? 

 

Schaeffer based his concerns on facts he knew from history, particularly the dreadful human manipulation experiments of the past century. There was the Third Reich’s notoriously fake science  that captivated academia and was pumped out unceasingly via a State-run press, and it resulted in the mass extermination of racial groups. There was also the Soviet Gulag, penal camps for the non-compliant. This history informed Schaeffer that an elite class was capable of wielding science and technology for its own purposes. A scientific technological power centered in corporations, political state, mainstream media, along with a supportive religious community, could manipulate facts to fit any narrative they wanted to dream up. So he ventured to suggest a time could come when

Schaeffer noted that under controlled regimes science is purposefully
skewed and manipulated in order to reach conclusions that bolster its
own power base. The science “manipulators” that Dr. Schaeffer warned in 1970 then were
already abandoning the rational Scientific Method based on knowledge
and reason. He stated his belief that “I am convinced that science as we have known it
with a commitment to objectivity cannot continue now that this
philosophy is gone.” (p. 91) 

 

Why did Schaeffer focus so much attention on the loss of scientific objectivity? Objective science has traditionally
recognized and acknowledged that it is not truth, but it seeks to
establish facts. It will posit a thesis and then test that thesis with
various hypotheses. If it changes its opinion it
doesn’t lie. It simply acknowledges that more information has come in. Wherever freedom of inquiry flourishes rational science will continually
re-examine, re-test and re-evaluate facts that come in that either
support or challenge the thesis. 

 

Consider Exhibit D above, which depicts Tunnel Vision. If we look at this graph in terms of science, the middle darkest orange area would represent scientific fact. The near-, mid-, and far-peripheral vision fields would be areas for further investigation, experimentation and analysis. As facts come in, the scientific fact in the middle would be enhanced with additional information, either pro or con, to bolster its case. A good scientist will often look far afield in order to locate additional data.

If scientific inquiry is stifled the peripheral research may be not funded and scholarly papers might not be published. In a healthy free society the scientist can seek to continue his line of inquiry, solicit additional funding, or pursue more research. In an open scholarly climate, the scientific and medical researchers will freely engage in peer review, analysis, discussion and debate. Further research and study will be pursued.

Exhibit E: Tunnel Vision

How does scientific Tunnel Vision affect the populace? Look at Exhibit E above. Consider what might happen to this person if the lighter green Central Field line of sight is all he sees? He is only cognizant of a limited field of facts. Quite literally if his Peripheral Vision is cut off he may injure himself. Obviously this is dangerous. What would happen if the peripheral fields of scientific research were cut off from his view? What if the only line of knowledge was a narrow segment of limited facts? What could happen to the person if key peripheral facts were deleted? The science would be faulty. It would lack key data points. This, too, could be dangerous.

 

Now consider what might happen if the Central Field of focus is shifted up or down. What if the facts became skewed towards one Peripheral side or another? In this way people could be deceived. They may think that they are seeing a Central Field of facts, but what they are really seeing is Peripheral Vision,
which is a distortion. So if the public only sees a skewed field of focus, they are not seeing true facts. They might be seeing fake science. They might even be fooled into thinking this fake field is the truth. 

 

And this is precisely what Schaeffer was warning about. He said
that the time would come when this sort of manipulation would be done deliberately, and it
could be life-threatening. He was suspicious that science “manipulators” could utilize both
technology and media to control man’s line of vision. Facts could be
distorted, deleted or denied. New pseudo-facts could replace them. So
anything people assumed to be truth or fact, may not be. It
might be faked to gird up an agenda.

 

 

The fact is that postmodern science itself has become an evolving narrative. As such it is open to continual adjustments and alterations which are not necessarily grounded in fact nor solid research. This is intentionally a “paradigm shift.” It is the spiritualization of science. It is the politicization of science.

 

Previously we wrote about this in a January 25, 2006 Herescope post titled “Shifting the Emergent Paradigm.” We were warning about the manipulation that was bringing mysticism into the church. In this description below one can see that the emerging science was based on both an evolutionary religious and revolutionary political worldview. Note well what is highlighted in bold: 

The philosophy of the paradigm shift is quite significant. The concept originated with Thomas Kuhn in his 1962 book The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (University of Chicago Press). Kuhn, a scientist in academia, broke ground by applying Hegelian dialectics and existential thought to the field of science. He proposed that science itself is evolving and has no absolutes. Kuhn described science as a series of rocky shifts throughout history, created by a crisis when the old scientific model encounters new information that doesn’t fit. When enough new information is accumulated, a “revolution” would occur and a new scientific paradigm would emerge; e.g. Newtonian science gave way to Einstein’s theories.

Kuhn paralleled scientific revolution to political revolution, and noted that in “both political and scientific development the sense of malfunction that can lead to crisis is a prerequisite to revolution” (p. 91). In other words, it is necessary to create a crisis first before the paradigm can be shifted. Kuhn then makes the remarkable statement that the use of force may be necessary to shift to the new paradigm: “…the parties to a revolutionary conflict must finally resort to the techniques of mass persuasion often including force” (p. 92) .

Kuhn speaks about this paradigm shift in terms of a religious conversion. First, he remarks that a “mental transformation” is insufficient. “Rather we must look for indirect and behavioral evidence that the scientist with a new paradigm sees differently from the way he had seen before” (p. 114)… Kuhn advised that before a group can communicate fully, they must “experience the conversion that we have been calling a paradigm” (p. 149). This conversion is seen as a “transfer of allegiance” from one paradigm to another (p. 150).

The science “manipulators” that Dr. Schaeffer
predicted are now openly functioning as fake prophets promulgating fake facts. We have arrived at a new era in a planned attempt to
technologically alter man.[5] A vast new array of enhanced tools for deception are arising rapidly. As we have pointed out from historical examples above, fake science can be deadly.[6]

We are witnessing the rise of the reign of fake prophets and they are not friendly, nor open-minded, nor do they tolerate biblical Truth. This calls for
radical discernment on the part of Christians who follow Jesus Christ.
Why? Because it appears that the next phase of Schaeffer’s predicted Establishment Elite’s marketing program intends to rely heavily upon psycho-spiritual manipulation. It will use rewards for
compliance and rely upon penalties such as fear, pressure, coercion,
threats and intimidation, and worse. 

 

As we mentioned in the previous post, fear is a potent method of manipulation. Here is a way to test it out: if you hear someone, including yourself, spout off a rote narrative, word-by-word, line-by-line, memorized and rehearsed, that mimics what you hear in the mainstream media, then you have probably been affected by the current narratives. 

 

Many years ago I helped people get out of cults and the occult whose minds had succumbed to brainwashing. It begins with isolation, fear, intimidation, multiple sensory deprivations and there is continual indoctrination. (Notice how similar this description is to the past year and a half of life on earth.) One of the telling features of a cult member is that they are forbidden to think outside the box. In other words they have an induced Tunnel Vision that prohibits them from knowing anything outside of of the narrative. Hence their truncated view of reality is not only skewed, but their faith may be missing key Gospel truths.

 

This is why Scripture warns repeatedly to not be deceived, to be awake and alert, and to ask for wisdom (James 1:5). Many Christians do not rely upon God’s Spirit to give them wisdom about life choices and decision; but rather they rely on worldly media or entities in authority. But Jesus specifically warned:

  

 

We have previously written a
detailed report about manipulative tactics used within the church world by church leaders HERE. Here is a summary of the methods that have been used against people who do not embrace the fake:

 

 

Based on our extensive earlier research and reports on this blog about how evangelical leaders were trained as change agents,[8] we are issuing a strong warning to Bible believers everywhere: Beware of key church leaders who are being recruited to become cheerleaders for any new fake science narratives. They already have your church and your pastor in their global databank. Chances are they’ve already identified the resistors in their crosshairs. 

Recently a discerning friend sent out the following alert after reading the article cited above describing the methods of manipulation:

The change agents and their methods have brought us to the point where the brainwashing has reached a critical level, which is a necessary ingredient as we read the prophetical future in Scripture – 

2 Thessalonians 2:10-11 
And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness
in them that perish;
because they received not the love of the Truth,
that they might be saved.
And for this cause 
God shall send them strong delusion,
that they should believe a lie:

It is amazing to me how many evangelical churches and leaders fell prey to this method of manipulation, not realizing it had its origination in the kingdom of Satan, as he prepared for the greatest attempt of deception in world history – convincing people, including the Jews, that the anti-Christ is the real Christ.[9]

 

Here is a stern warning about gradualism. The entire fake science paradigm is built upon the slippery sands of evolutionary thinking. It is founded upon the false dialectics of Truth plus Error equals New Truth. Examine what you have been told is scientific fact to see if it may have been deliberately manipulated. Has your field of vision been purposefully skewed? Have you made decisions or reached judgments based on truncated information? Has your line of vision to discern the truth/facts been sharply skewed? Have key facts been eviscerated? Are there vital data that have been deleted?

 

If we think that it is hard to discern the fake now, Jesus’s warning in Mark 13:22 is even more serious. He stated that fake prophets shall rise, and shall shew signs and wonders so potent, so believable, so counterfeit that if it were possible it could deceive even the elect. We now live in a time of incredible technological and scientific capabilities to create fakes. There is a vast potential for sophisticated deceptions. 

 

Believers, you must stand on Scripture alone. The time is coming when the only
source for Truth will be found in Scripture. If any narrative runs
contrary to the full counsel of the Word of God and the Gospel of Jesus
Christ, do not believe it. It is not biblical Truth. If any one adds to
or deletes Scripture, it is not Truth (Rev. 22:18). If an esteemed
leader comes to you with a new narrative that supplants or embellishes biblical Truth, do not fall prey to it. 2 John
10 warns clearly: 

“If there come any unto you,
and bring not this doctrine,
receive him not into your house,
neither bid him God speed.”

 

One thing is now certain. It is very difficult to ascertain accurate factual information. Another thing is now certain. The voices of those who are attempting to provide truthful information are being shuttered. A third thing is now certain. The kings of technology are operating as a global state overseeing all of the nations and peoples of the world, and they control the flow of information.

 

Finally, if you know the WORD of the GOSPEL of salvation in Jesus Christ is the TRUTH you must speak it out now while it is yet possible to do so: 

8. The
excessive evangelical fascination with leadership has given rise to
cult-like status for its superstars and created lockstep blind
followers. Read:

• Sacred Cows and Stars
• CA$H COW$ & FAT CAT$
• Stuffed Shirts & Their Sycophants
• Scurrilous Shepherds & Their Starving Sheep